Corporate Meetings - Trade Unions of December 17, 2010 10:00
The meeting was opened by the company that requested feedback to the trade unions on the reorganization plan submitted at the last meeting of 01/12/2010. The trade unions
have shown that the analysis of the plan has proven difficult if not impossible not only because of the lack of official documentation but also for the presence of certain elements which would militate against the continuation of the discussion. In addition, the steps taken by the company in relation to the reorganization of the staff were conducted unilaterally bypassing the negotiating table. The elements of dissonance than the expectations of the past few months have raised concerns about the real intention by the company to continue the path taken. The trade unions have declared their willingness to meet and dialogue on all issues, even the most difficult, as long as the discussion returns to be realized in a useful and justifiable approach that makes the contribution of trade unions to the negotiating table.
Confindustria said that any action taken by the company in recent months has been conducted in good faith and misunderstandings that seem to have generated are due to the complexity and relative difficulty of the route taken in the direction reorganization of the company. Hopefully, the difficulties of sharing with the unions can be overcome by entering into the heart of the debate. The trade unions
greeted with satisfaction the readiness to enter into the heart of the negotiation. In this regard, however, was asked an act of responsibility not only of continuity but also and above all business in compliance with the workers who will once again asked for a substantial sacrifice. This can be justified only in terms of a true corporate turnaround. In the absence of a credible plan for future investments, and then only in the presence of a plan to contain costs, it is not considered acceptable for the rehabilitation serious business on the backs of workers. Therefore, the unions asked to exclude from the plate negotiating the arguments concerning externalities (including contracts ENASARCO feared for MedTech ISF) and to discuss solutions to curb disparities in the application of CIGS to achieve integration and adequate wage for the employees affected by measure. In fact, they could see their salaries reduced substantially in the absence of effective integration. Then, the unions stressed the need to exclude the use of measures of CIGS 0 hours and reduce the gap on the reduction assumed from that time seems to favor personalized, custom. In addition, considered the principles underlying the CIGS, it is not considered feasible to implement this tool without being carefully assessed the issues relating to the substitutability of employees within the same function and to retraining and redeployment of employees affected by the measure CIGS or any outsourcing.
The company pointed out that the primary concern remains that of industrial production and therefore the funds that are intended to strengthen production and sales. In this regard, however, that the redevelopment plan will be drafted during the 2011 does not require relocation of staff will be retrained.
In this regard, the Trade Unions have reiterated the need to make very clear to see in the CIGS avoid solutions that may not be inherent to the measure. In particular, CIGS can not do without a redevelopment plan and can not be considered a tool that facilitates the reporting of time in a redundant structure. Thus, while recognizing the efforts of management to try and ensure business continuity, the unions expressed their interest to assess in detail the appropriateness of the route taken.
The company said that the need for reorganization is deep but not you want to create negative effects on employment levels. In fact, part of the reorganization of the company feels the need has already proved successful in the spring in the BU MedTech that there has been no impact on employees. The reorganization plan recently submitted to the Trade Unions is the result of an effort to ensure efficiency in the face of a low impact on workers.
summarizes the main points of the discussion, the meeting was adjourned until January 3, 2011 when trade unions Company and will discuss the contents of the draft request that the company intends to present.
The meeting was opened by the company that requested feedback to the trade unions on the reorganization plan submitted at the last meeting of 01/12/2010. The trade unions
have shown that the analysis of the plan has proven difficult if not impossible not only because of the lack of official documentation but also for the presence of certain elements which would militate against the continuation of the discussion. In addition, the steps taken by the company in relation to the reorganization of the staff were conducted unilaterally bypassing the negotiating table. The elements of dissonance than the expectations of the past few months have raised concerns about the real intention by the company to continue the path taken. The trade unions have declared their willingness to meet and dialogue on all issues, even the most difficult, as long as the discussion returns to be realized in a useful and justifiable approach that makes the contribution of trade unions to the negotiating table.
Confindustria said that any action taken by the company in recent months has been conducted in good faith and misunderstandings that seem to have generated are due to the complexity and relative difficulty of the route taken in the direction reorganization of the company. Hopefully, the difficulties of sharing with the unions can be overcome by entering into the heart of the debate. The trade unions
greeted with satisfaction the readiness to enter into the heart of the negotiation. In this regard, however, was asked an act of responsibility not only of continuity but also and above all business in compliance with the workers who will once again asked for a substantial sacrifice. This can be justified only in terms of a true corporate turnaround. In the absence of a credible plan for future investments, and then only in the presence of a plan to contain costs, it is not considered acceptable for the rehabilitation serious business on the backs of workers. Therefore, the unions asked to exclude from the plate negotiating the arguments concerning externalities (including contracts ENASARCO feared for MedTech ISF) and to discuss solutions to curb disparities in the application of CIGS to achieve integration and adequate wage for the employees affected by measure. In fact, they could see their salaries reduced substantially in the absence of effective integration. Then, the unions stressed the need to exclude the use of measures of CIGS 0 hours and reduce the gap on the reduction assumed from that time seems to favor personalized, custom. In addition, considered the principles underlying the CIGS, it is not considered feasible to implement this tool without being carefully assessed the issues relating to the substitutability of employees within the same function and to retraining and redeployment of employees affected by the measure CIGS or any outsourcing.
The company pointed out that the primary concern remains that of industrial production and therefore the funds that are intended to strengthen production and sales. In this regard, however, that the redevelopment plan will be drafted during the 2011 does not require relocation of staff will be retrained.
In this regard, the Trade Unions have reiterated the need to make very clear to see in the CIGS avoid solutions that may not be inherent to the measure. In particular, CIGS can not do without a redevelopment plan and can not be considered a tool that facilitates the reporting of time in a redundant structure. Thus, while recognizing the efforts of management to try and ensure business continuity, the unions expressed their interest to assess in detail the appropriateness of the route taken.
The company said that the need for reorganization is deep but not you want to create negative effects on employment levels. In fact, part of the reorganization of the company feels the need has already proved successful in the spring in the BU MedTech that there has been no impact on employees. The reorganization plan recently submitted to the Trade Unions is the result of an effort to ensure efficiency in the face of a low impact on workers.
summarizes the main points of the discussion, the meeting was adjourned until January 3, 2011 when trade unions Company and will discuss the contents of the draft request that the company intends to present.
0 comments:
Post a Comment